The Court allowed the petition to implead the proposed respondents as respondents 19-21 in the pending Second Appeal to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, directing the registry to amend the cause title and post the matter.
Petition allowed to implead petitioners as respondents 19 to 21; Registry directed to amend cause title and post matter on 18.11.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No. 16908 of 2024
in S.A.No. 454 of 2007
C.M.P. No. 16908 of 2024 in S.A.No.454 of 2007
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to implead the proposed respondents as a necessary parties in the above Second Appeal.
not to make any encumbrance over the property. Inspite of that, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P. No. 16908 of 2024 in S.A.No.454 of 2007
petitioners purchased the property. Therefore, their purchase was affected by principles of lispendence and prayed to dismiss this petition.
24.10.2024
rpp
C.M.P. No. 16908 of 2024 in S.A.No.454 of 2007
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 16908 of 2024 in S.A. No. 454 of 2007
24.10.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proposed respondents, who purchased the property prior to the filing of the Second Appeal, should be impleaded as necessary parties.
Petitioners (prop. respondents)
1st Respondent/Appellant
Senbagavalli
Ramadoss
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
