Rajammal v. Ilayarani
Case brief
What is this about?
The order grants two C.M.P. petitions to condone a 218-day delay in filing representation for two appeals, noting sufficient reasons were stated.
What did the court decide?
C.M.P. Nos. 16298 & 16299 of 2024 treated as allowed to condone 218-day delay in representation.
What the court decided
C.M.P.Nos.16298 & 16299 of 2024 in A.S.No.sr33333 & sr33334 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
CMP No.16298 of 2024 has been filed to condone the delay of the 218 days in representation in A.S.No.sr33333 of 2023.
2.CMP No.16299 of 2024 has been filed to condone the delay of the 218 days in representation in A.S.No.sr33334 of 2023.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
4.Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these Petitions and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, these Petitions are ordered as prayed for.
01.08.2024
sai
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 218 days in representation in A.S.No.sr33333 of 2023.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
Coram
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court