The High Court recorded the compliance of a conditional order and condoned the delay in filing a second appeal.
Condoned the 485-day delay in representing the second appeal; directed registry to number the appeal; matter posted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.16007 of 2024
CMP.No.16007 of 2024 and SA.SR.No.32468 of 2023
N.MALA,J.
The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo of compliance stating that the conditional order dated 30.07.2024 passed by this Court has been complied with.
2.The said memo is recorded and the delay of 485 days in representing the above second appeal in S.A.Sr.No.32468 of 2023 is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is ordered.
3.Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
4.Post the matter on 05.08.2024.
1/2
CMP.No.16007 of 2024
ah
01.08.2024
2/2
N.MALA,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
