Miscellaneous petition in an appeal seeking transposition of respondent No.2 as appellant No.4, with respondent No.1's rights kept open. The court allowed it and disposed of the petition.
Respondent No.2 transposed as appellant No.4 in the appeal; rights and contentions of respondent No.1 kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.160 of 2021 in OSA No.206 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Shri.Balasubramaniam states that the relief as prayed for in this miscellaneous petition i.e. transposing respondent No.2 as appellant No.4 in the appeal, keeping open the rights and contentions of respondent No.1, be granted.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, C.J.) (SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.)
18.11.2024
tar
K.R. Shriram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
