The State of Tamil Nadu v. Diamond Jubilee Higher
Case brief
What is this about?
None of the matter was appointed, which is instructed to be listed for the next day's mention, it was directed to be listed for mention on 6.8.2024.
None of the matter was appointed, which is instructed to be listed for the next day's mention, it was directed to be listed for mention on 6.8.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.15688 of 2024 in W.A.No. SR 92797 of 2024
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and P.B.BALAJI,J.
In the forenoon session when the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the respondent. Hence, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, we condoned the delay by imposing costs.
In the afternoon session, a mention is made by learned counsel for the respondent that the order under appeal is passed by one of us ( P.B.B.,J. ) and hence, the matter may be released from this Bench.
Since mention is made before signing the order, we direct the Registry to list the matter tomorrow (6.8.2024) under the caption " for being mentioned ".
(D.K.K., ACJ.) (P.B.B., J.) 05.08.2024
bbr
D.K.K.
P.B.BALAJI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court