Perumal (Died) v. Munisamy (died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural petition in a second appeal seeking impleadment of legal heirs of deceased respondents 3 to 5 as respondents 4 to 6. Counsel for respondents had no objection. Registry directed to carry out the amendment and list the matter for further hearing.
What did the court decide?
Amendment carried out; legal heirs impleaded; matter listed on 19.08.2024
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM.P.No.13080 of 2024 in S.A.No.1292 of 2010 V.SIVAGNANAM,J.
This Petition has been filed to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased 3 to 5 as respondents 4 to 6 in S.A.No.1292 of 2010.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the respondents undertake to file vakalat for the proposed respondents and submitted that he has no objection to carryout the amendment.
3.Registry is directed to carryout the amendments and list the matter on 19.08.2024.
26.07.2024
(2/2)
gd
Page 1 of 1
Coram
V.SIVAGNANAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court