Selvaraj v. Sellammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge allowed a petition to condone a delay of 138 days in preferring an appeal against a decree passed in a civil suit.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed; Appeal to be numbered and posted for hearing.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.11704 of 2024
in A.S.No.sr65665 of 2024
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 138 days in preferring the above Appeal against the decree and judgment dated 13.10.2023, passed in the Suit in O.S.No.405 of 2018 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Salem.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for Respondents 1 to 5. Eventhough R6 & R8 were served, no one represented on behalf of them.
3.Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Petition and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Petition is ordered as prayed for.
4.Registry is directed to number Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the Appeal on 01.08.2024.
23.07.2024
sai
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 138 days in preferring the appeal should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents 1 to 5
Coram
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court