The bench disposed of C.M.P. No. 11090 of 2024 in A.S. No. 365 of 2017, noting that the Appeal (filed in 2024) was stayed at the lower court. The court decided to post the Appeal in the normal course and denied the short adjournment sought by the Respondent's counsel, who had already filed a counter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.11090 of 2024 in A.S.No.365 of 2017
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent seeks short adjournment. He also submits that already he filed counter and he had informed the learned Counsel for the Appellant that he is seeking adjournment.
had been stayed on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Puducherry. Since, the Appeal is of the year 2024, the Appeal shall be posted in normal course.
06.12.2024
shl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal shall be posted in normal course given the E.P. stay and the year of appeal.
Whether to grant short adjournment sought by the learned Counsel for the Respondent.
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
