The Sub Registrar v. v Nandakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge permitted condonation of delay for filing an appeal. The respondent was absent despite notice. The appeal is listed for admission.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.10799 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.62347 of 2024
S.S.SUNDAR, J. and K.RAJASEKAR, J.
(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.)
Despite service of notice on the respondent and his name is printed in the cause list, there is no representation for the respondent.
This Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition for condonation of delay. Since the delay has been explained to the satisfaction of this Court, this petition is ordered.
Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order, and list the same for admission on 16.08.2024.
ss
Page No.1/1
Coram
S.S.SUNDAR
K.RAJASEKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court