Miscellaneous petitions in a pending second appeal sought condonation of delay in filing petitions to set aside abatement caused by the death of two appellants, and to implead their legal heirs as appellants. Respondents raised no objection; all petitions were allowed as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.Nos.10363, 10366, 10385, 10388, 10471 and 10474 of 2023
CMP.Nos.10363, 10366, 10385, 10388, 10471 and 10474 of 2023 in S.A.No.8 of 2006
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
CMP.Nos.10363 and 10385 of 2023 are filed to condone the delay of 173 days and 116 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased/2nd appellant and deceased/4th appellant respectively in the present Second Appeal.
abatement caused due to the death of the deceased/4th appellant and deceased/2nd appellant respectively in the present Second Appeal.
appellants herein as the legal heirs of the deceased/2nd appellant in the present Second Appeal.
proposed appellants herein as the legal heirs of the deceased/4th appellant and rank them as appellants 9 and 10 in the present Second Appeal.
CMP.Nos.10363, 10366, 10385, 10388, 10471 and 10474 of 2023
The learned counsel appearing for the respondents stated no objection for allowing the above petitions.
support of these petitions, these Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered as prayed for.
09.07.2024
jas
Note : Registry is directed to carryout suitable amendments in the second appeal.
CMP.Nos.10363, 10366, 10385, 10388, 10471 and 10474 of 2023
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
jas
CMP.Nos.10363, 10366, 10385, 10388, 10471 and 10474 of 2023 in S.A.No.8 of 2006
09.07.2024
V. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
