B.Ravi v. Harisons
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court refused to condone the 161 days of delay in filing a Writ Appeal challenging an order that enhanced compensation for wrongful termination. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition for condonation was dismissed, and the Writ Appeal was rejected at the stage of leave.
What the court decided
CMP.No.10293/2024 in WA.SR.7764 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
C.M.P.No.10293 of 2024 in
WA.SR.No.7764 of 2024
B. Ravi
... Petitioner
Vs.
Harisons, Prop ASE Hotel (P) Ltd., New No.12, Old No.315, Valluvarkottam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 031
... Respondent
PRAYER in CMP.No.10293 of 2024: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under section 5 of Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 161 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order dated 15.06.2023 in W.P.No.8783 of 2013 on the file of this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 161 days in filing the Writ Appeal could be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B. Ravi
- respondent
Harisons, Prop ASE Hotel (P) Ltd.
Coram
J. Nisha Banu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court