This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.10036 of 2023 in TCA.SR.No.8278 of 2023
R.SURESH KUMAR, J. and C.SARAVANAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition.
Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, the delay in presenting the appeal is condoned and the petition is ordered.
Registry is directed to number the appeal and post for hearing.
(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 12.08.2024
KST
R.SURESH KUMAR
R.SURESH KUMAR
C.SARAVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
