Dismissed

The Superintendent, v. Sheela

Madras HC18 Apr 2024CMA(MD)/857/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal decree. The Government Advocate for the appellant submitted that the entire amount had been deposited and sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with no costs. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; No costs; Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

The Superintendent, Vs Sheela — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.M.A.(MD).No.857 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 18.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

C.M.A.(MD).No.857 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD).No.8021 of 2021

¶7

1.The Superintendent, Government Hospital, Pattukottai Town and Taluk,

¶8

Thanjavur District.

¶9

(The 1^st Appellant's designation was wrongly given by the Claimant) However, the Correct designation is that

¶10

The Chief Civil Surgeon,

¶11

Pattukottai Government Hospital,

¶12

Thanjavur District.

¶13

2.The Director, Medical Transport Department, Guindy, Chennai.

¶14

... Appellants/Respondents 1 & 2

¶15

Vs.

¶16

1.Sheela

¶17

... 1^st Respondent/Petitioner

¶18

2.Gnanapandithan

¶19

3.The Manager, Sumeet Unique Deltd Force, No.11 Uma Complex, Pattukottai Nagar & Munsif, Thanjavur District.

¶20

... 2^nd & 3^rd Respondents/ 2^nd & 4^th Respondents/

¶21

1/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

C.M.A.(MD).No.857 of 2021

¶24

(Cause Title accepted vide Court order dated 09.09.2021 made in C.M.P. (MD).No.7091 of 2021 in C.M.A.(MD).No.SR40709 of 2021)

¶25

PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act of 1988, to set aside the decree and judgment passed

¶26

by the Special District Court/Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thanjavur, made in M.C.O.P.No.1008 of 2018 dated 14.10.2020.

¶27

For Appellants : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezian, Government Advocate

¶28

For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadayalan for R2

¶29

ORDER

¶30

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the appellant would submit that the entire amount has been deposited by the appellant. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶31

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned Government

¶32

Advocate appearing for the appellant, this civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶33

18.04.2024

¶34

2/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.M.A.(MD).No.857 of 2021

¶37

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM

¶38

¶39

1.The Judge, Special District Court/Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thanjavur.

¶40

2.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶41

3/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

C.M.A.(MD).No.857 of 2021

¶44

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

¶45

¶46

C.M.A.(MD).No.857 of 2021

¶47

18.04.2024

¶48

4/4

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Superintendent, v. Sheela

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Superintendent, v. Sheela

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Renuga Devi Vs Velmurugan

K.R.Santharam Vs Kuttai D.Venkataraman

Cholamandalam Ms General Vs Selvi Alias Palaniselvi

Royal Sudndaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, Vs Muthumari

M.Mary Santhabai Vs K.Navin Kumar

The Regional Manager, Vs Kuthus alias Abdul Kuthus