The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal against interim maintenance awarded to the wife. The court held that the appellant's failure to pay the stipulated sum under the conditional stay order disentitled them from challenging the award.
The appeal and the application for stay were dismissed. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018 and
C.M.P(MD)No.9236 of 2018
M.Suresh
.. Appellant/Respondent/Respondent
Vs.
Mrs.Sumathi ... Respondent/Petitioner/Petitioner
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, against the order, dated 06.04.2018, passed in I.A.No.210 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.254 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.
For Appellant : Mr.AN.Ramanathan
For Respondent : Mr.A.Chandrakumar
Page 1 of 5
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018
JUDGMENT
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. and C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the respondent being aggrieved by the interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court payable to the wife.
Page 2 of 5
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018
Rs.3,000/- per month. It is reported that despite stay on condition to pay Rs.3,000/- as maintenance, the petitioner/appellant has not paid the amount.
(G.J.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 22.01.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
PM
Page 3 of 5
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018
To
1.The Family Court, Tiruchirappalli.
Page 4 of 5
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. and C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
PM
C.M.A(MD)No.828 of 2018
22.01.2024
Page 5 of 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's failure to comply with the conditional stay order disentitles them from sustaining the appeal against interim maintenance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Suresh
Mrs.Sumathi
G.JAYACHANDRAN
C.KUMARAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
