counsel for the appellant and hence, reduced the monthly income of the deceased from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.10,000/-. It is seen that the Tribunal failed to award future prospects and hence, this Court is inclined to grant a sum of Rs.4,000/- towards future prospects. Since the age of the deceased was found to be 29 years at the time of accident, the appropriate multiplier to be applied as per the Smt.Sarla Verma .vs. Delhi Transport Corporation reported in 2009(2) TN MAC 1(SC) case, is '17'. Further, the Tribunal deducted 1/4th towards personal expenses. Since the deceased was a bachelor at the time of accident, as per Sarla Varma’s case, this Court is inclined to deduct 50% towards personal expenses. The monthly loss of income after deduction would be Rs.10000 + 4000 - 50% = Rs.7,000/- and therefore, the loss of dependency would be Rs.7,000/- x 12 x 17 =Rs.14,28,000/-. Insofar as the consortium is concerned, no amount has been awarded. Therefore, this Court is inclined to award a sum of Rs.40,000/- each to the respondents 1 to 4/claimants under the head ‘consortium’ and the other heads are confirmed.