Madurai Bench extended three months time to the Principal District Judge, Madurai, to dispose of A.S.No.8 of 2011 pending on superior courts file
Three months time extended for disposing the case in A.S.No.8 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMA(MD) NO. 539 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23-02-2026 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
CMA(MD) NO. 539 of 2011
1.Indirani
2.Rajasekaran
3.Vijayakumar
Appellant(s)
Vs
1.Veerasamy Naicker
2.L.Ganesan
3.L.Yoganathan
Respondent(s)
Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.8 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Madurai, dated 17.02.2011, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.147 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif, Tirumangalam dated 22.04.2003.
ORDER
Today, this matter has been listed under the caption “Extension of Time for Trial Court” to dispose of the case in A.S.No.8 of 2011 pending on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Madurai.
1/2
CMA(MD) NO. 539 of 2011
addressed a letter to the Registry, dated 19.01.2026, requesting extension of further time of three months to dispose of the case in A.S.No.8 of
2011 pursuant to the order of this Court dated 26.02.2024.
this Court is inclined to grant further time to dispose of the above case. Accordingly, three months time is extended for disposing the case in A.S.No.8 of 2011 from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
23.02.2026
Note : The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Court below forthwith.
mkn
To
The Principal District Court, Madurai.
2/2
Indirani
Rajasekaran
Vijayakumar
Veerasamy Naicker
L. Ganesan
L. Yoganathan
P. Vadamalai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
