Rajan v. a.Sarojini
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act filed by Rajan against an order of the District Judge, Family Court, for non-prosecution, as his counsel failed to appear despite a final posting with a warning.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs.
What the court decided
C.M.A(MD)No.40 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.10.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
C.M.A(MD)No.40 of 2019
Rajan
.. Appellant / Petitioner
Vs.
1.A.Sarojini 2.T.Anbu .. Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family
Courts Act, against the fair and executable order dated 07.09.2018 passed in H.M.O.P.No.59 of 2018 on the file of the District Judge, Family Court, Kanniyakumari District Division at Nagercoil.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss an appeal due to non-prosecution by the appellant.
Whether to entertain further adjournments for non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
Whether costs should be awarded against the appellant for dismissing the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajan
- respondent
A.Sarojini
- respondent
T.Anbu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court