Dismissed
Suresh v. S. Rukmani
Madras HCCMA(MD)/329/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite having filed a vakalatnama, which was subsequently returned.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.M.A.(MD)No.329 of 2013
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
Dated: 19.03.2024
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
¶6
C.M.A.(MD)No.329 of 2013 and
¶7
M.P(MD) No.1 of 2013
¶8
Suresh
¶9
..Appellant/1st Respondent
¶10
Vs.
¶11
- S. Rukmani
¶12
- Balamurugan
¶13
- Pandiselvi
¶14
- Jothilakshmi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Suresh
- respondent
S. Rukmani
- respondent
Balamurugan
- respondent
Pandiselvi
- respondent
Jothilakshmi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court