Disposed

The Branch Manager v. P.Rasumuthu ( died) 1. Ponnazhagi

Madras HC14 Dec 2024CMA(MD)/318/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

National Lok Adalat awarded settlement between United India Insurance Company and death claimants. Parties settled for Rs. 27.58 Lakhs plus interest, reducing the Tribunal's earlier award of Rs. 38.55 Lakhs. Appellant directed to deposit settlement amount.

What did the court decide?

Appellant directed to deposit Rs.27,58,536+ 7.5% interest to M.C.O.P.No.69 of 2016 within six weeks; other aspects of award unaltered.

The Branch Manager Vs P.Rasumuthu ( died) 1. Ponnazhagi — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTE, MADURAI

¶2

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625023

¶3

Saturday the 14th day of December 2024 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided Over by The Honourable Mrs Justice R. KALAIMATHI

¶6

and

¶7

Members P.Mohandoss, District Judge(Retired), K.Samidurai, Advocate

¶8

CMA(MD) No.318 of 2024

¶9

(Appeal against the judgment and decree passed on 13/06/2023 in MCOP.69/2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Court for E.C. & NDPS Act cases, Pudukottai.)

¶10

The Branch Manager

¶11

United India Insurance Company ltd., Pudukkottai.

... Appellant

Versus

P.Rasumuthu ( died)

Ponnazhagi W/o.Rasumuthu.

¶16

2.Thamaraiselvi W/o.Late. Karuppaiah.

¶17

3.Yashvitha D/o.Late. Karuppaiah (Minor Rep.by mother and guardian Thamaraiselvi.)

¶18

4.M.Sakthivel S/o.Rasumuthu.

¶19

5.N.Salaimalai S/o.Rasumuthu.

¶20

Ganesan S/o.Subbaiah.

¶21

... Respondents

¶22

This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties present. The counsel for the appellant Mr.M.Arjun Varman and the counsel for the second respondent Mr.D.Ramesh Kumar are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties and with the assistance of the Bench, both sides consented for settlement.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

AWARD

¶25

Already the Tribunal has passed an award of Rs.38,55,782/- with 7.5% interest from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realization (excluding the period, which is dismissed for default, from 27.08.2019 to 04.01.2021).The Insurance Company has filed the above appeal challenging the award passed by the Tribunal. Now, the parties have arrived at a settlement for a sum of Rs. 27,58,536/- with 7.5% p.a. interest.The same is recorded.

¶26

The appellant/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the amount of Rs.27,58,536/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.m. from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of realization (excluding the period, which is dismissed for default, from 27.08.2019 to 04.01.2021) to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.69 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Court for E.C. & NDPS Act cases, Pudukottai, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount, if any already deposited. All the other aspects of the Award in M.C.O.P.No.69 of 2006 stands unaltered.

¶27

The claimants/respondents 1, 2, 4 & 5 are permitted to withdraw their share amount, as per the apportionment fixed by the Tribunal, less the amount, if any already withdrawn, by filing appropriate application before the Tribunal.

¶28

The share of the minor/third respondent is directed to be depostied in an interest bearing fixed deposit, initially for a period of three years, renewable till the minor attains majority. The second respondent/mother of the minor child is entitled to withdraw the interest once in six months till she attains majority.

¶29

The Branch Manager United India Insurance Company ltd., Pudukkottai.

¶30

Counsel for the Appellant

¶31

Ponnazhagi W/o.Rasumuthu.

¶32

Thamaraiselvi W/o.Late. Karuppaiah.

¶33

Yashvitha D/o.Late. Karuppaiah (Minor Rep.by mother and guardian Thamaraiselvi.)

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

M.Sakthivel S/o.Rasumuthu.

¶36

N.Salaimalai S/o.Rasumuthu.

¶37

Ganesan S/o.Subbaiah.

¶38

Counsel for the Respondents

¶39

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶40

The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamilnadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶41

The Original of the award shall be placed in the court record and copy of the award, be kept with High Court Legal Services Committee and one copy each is furnished to both parties free of cost.

¶42

In agreement of the above, both parties and their counsel have affixed their signatures/ thumb impressions in presence of the Lok Adalat Bench admitting the terms and today conditions and accordingly, the award is passed.

JUDGE

MEMBER

MEMBER

To: The Parties/Advocate concerned Copy To

¶47

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PUDUKKOTTAI..

¶48

The Officer-in-Charge, High Court Legal Services Committee, Madurai.

¶49

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

Typed By APD PA To The Hon'ble Judges

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Branch Manager v. P.Rasumuthu ( died) 1. Ponnazhagi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Branch Manager v. P.Rasumuthu ( died) 1. Ponnazhagi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Divisional Manager Vs Meenakshi

The Branch Manager Vs Uthamaraj

R.Anteen Princey Vs R.Anetter Alwyn

k. muthukumaran Vs a.Anilkumar

M.Muthuramalingam Vs The Managing Director

K.v.Ashok Kumar Vs S.Pushpam