Balakrishnan v. Vimala
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed Civil Miscellaneous Appeals for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite being given an opportunity to argue the matter.
What the court decided
C.M.A.No.999 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
C.M.A.No.999 of 2024 and CM.A.No.4802 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.5844 of 2020
Balakrishnan ... Appellant in both the CMAs Vs.
Vimala ... Respondent in both the CMAs
Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 f the Family Courts Act r/w section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the order and decretal order dated 08.11.2019 passed in H.M.O.P.No.225 of 2018 on the file of the Family Court at Cuddalore.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.Muralidharan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Balakrishnan
- respondent
Vimala
Coram
J.Nisha Banu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · J. Nisha Banu R.sakthivel
- Order 2 · C.v. Karthikeyan K.rajasekar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court