and the claimant has not raised any issue on the aspect of negligence and therefore, this Court is not venturing into the same. The major grievances of the Appellant/claimant is with regard to the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. It is claimed by the appellant that though the accident is of the year 2016, however, the Tribunal had taken had erroneously taken a sum of Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability. However, as per the existing law at the relevant point of time, the Tribunal ought to have fixed a sum of Rs.6,000/- per percentage of disability. Hence, this Court is inclined to fix a sum of Rs.6,000/per percentage of disability. On a perusal of Ex.P.9, which is the disability certificate issued by the Doctor, P.W.2, it reveals that the appellant suffered disability of 38%. It is to be pointed out that the percentage of disability varies from doctor to doctor. Hence, considering the deposition made by the PW2, Doctor who examined the appellant/claimant, the Ex.P.9, the Disability certificate and also taking into account the nature of injuries suffered by the appellant, the tribunal had fixed the disability sustained by the appellant at the rate of 22% in which this Court does not finds any fault with. Therefore, the amount under the head Disability stands enhanced to a sum of Rs.1,32,000/(22% x Rs.6,000/- = Rs.1,32,000/-).
