Dismissed
V.Ramachandran v. the Chairman
Madras HCCMA/330/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal on default due to the appellant's non-appearance and lack of representation on the hearing date.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for default. Connected civil miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.M.A.No.330 of 2022
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 21.12.2024
¶4
CORAM :
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
¶6
C.M.A.No.330 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.2216 of 2022
¶7
V.Ramachandran
¶8
... Appellant
¶9
-vs-
¶10
- 1.The Chairman, TANGEDCO, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
¶11
- 2.The Chief Engineer (Distribution), TANGEDCO, Trichy Zone, Thennur, Trichy 17.
¶12
- 3.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Rajaji Nagar, Ariyalur.
¶13
- 4.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Ariyalur.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
V.Ramachandran
- respondent
The Chairman, TANGEDCO
- respondent
The Chief Engineer (Distribution), TANGEDCO
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO
- respondent
The District Collector, Ariyalur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court