Appeal and revision against interlocutory orders in a 1988 partition-related suit were dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the suit itself had been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
Prayer in C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010
P.Ranjithkumar Satyadoss ... Appellant
Vs. 1.A.Rajeswari 2.A.Natarajan 3.A.Vasanthi 4.A.Saroja 5.A.Sivarajan 6.A.Manoranjitham 7.A.Karthikeyan @ Jayabal 8.A.Mallika 9.V.Kalidoss Pillai 10.P.Padmavathi 11.PMrilalini 12.P.Sitalakshmi 13.P.Saradamani 14.P.Pushpakanthi 15.P.Thirumurugadoss ... Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of C.P.C, to set aside the order and decreetal order made in I.A.No.282 of 2005 in O.S.No.9 of 1988 dated 09.11.2009 on the file of the Additional District Court, Puducherry at Karaikal.
1/5
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
For Appellant : Mrs.P.Veena Suresh for Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondents : No appearance
Prayer in C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010 P.Ranjithkumar Satyadoss ... Appellant Vs. 1.V.Kalidoss Pillai 2.Padmavathy 3.P.Mrilalini 4.P.Sitalakshmi 5.P.Saradamani 6.P.Pushpakanthi 7.P.Thirumurugadoss 8.A.Rajeswari 9.A.Natarajan 10.A.Vasanthi 11.A.Saroja 12.A.Sivarajan 13.A.Manoranjitham 14.A.Karthikeyan @ Jayabal 15.A.Mallika ... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C, to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 09.11.2009 passed in I.A.No.265 of 2005 in O.S.No.9 of 1988 on the file of the Additional District Court, Puducherry, Karaikal.
For Petitioner : Mrs.P.Veena Suresh for Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondents : No appearance
2/5
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 has been filed challenging the order dated
09.11.2009 passed in I.A.No.282 of 2005 in O.S.No.9 of 1988 by the Additional District Court, Puducherry at Karaikal.
3/5
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
in C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010, C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010 are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
11.11.2024
Speaking Judgment/Non-speaking Judgment Index :Yes/No Neutral citation: Yes/No ssb To The Additional District Court, Puducherry at Karaikal.
4/5
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
M.DHANDAPANI, J
ssb
C.M.A.No.3181 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4054 of 2010
11.11.2024
5/5
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Ranjithkumar Satyadoss
A.Rajeswari
A.Natarajan
A.Vasanthi
A.Saroja
V.Kalidoss Pillai
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
