Partly allowed

Radha v. Balakrishnan

Madras HC27 Mar 2024CMA/2850/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This civil miscellaneous appeal challenged the compensation award in a motor accident claim petition. The High Court confirmed liability but enhanced the compensation awarded to the legal representatives of a deceased person from Rs.15,10,800 to Rs.20,19,400, ruling on notional income and multipliers.

What did the court decide?

Compensation enhanced from Rs.15,10,800 to Rs.20,19,400 with 7.5% interest per annum.

Radha Vs Balakrishnan — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Reserved on Pronounced on 22.02.2024 27.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

¶6

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶7

1.Radha (48 years) W/o.Chinnamadhu

¶8

2.Chinnamadhu (50 years) S/o.Mariappan 3.C.Aruna (27 years) D/o.Chinnamadhu 4.Akila (25 years) D/o.Chinnamadhu

¶9

All are residing at D.No.2/162 K.Mottur Village Puliyampatti Post Pochampalli Taluk ... Appellants

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.Balakrishnan S/o.Parthesi Thevar No.49-A, Sathankulam Maruthakulam Via Nangunery Taluk Tirunelveli District

¶12

1/8

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶15

2.M/s.Raja Agency 464, RSP Building DMP Road, Perichipalayam Bus Stop Tiruppur 641 607

¶16

3.The Branch Manager National Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office No.58, Rajaji Street Kangayam Periyar District 638 701

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award in Judgment and Decree dated 29.03.2021 made in MCOP.No.1159 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Court, Krishnagiri.

¶19

For Appellants : Mr.S.P.Yuaraj For Respondents : Mr.J.Chandran (for R3)

¶20

J U D G M E N T

¶21

The Appeal has been filed against the award in Judgment and Decree

¶22

dated 29.03.2021 made in MCOP.No.1159 of 2019 on the file of the Motor

¶23

Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Court, Krishnagiri.

¶24

2/8

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶27

2.The claim Petitioners are the Appellants herein and they filed this Appeal, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded in MCOP.No.1159 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Court, Krishnagiri. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

¶28

3.The legal representatives of the deceased Anand filed MCOP.No.1159 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special District Court, Krishnagiri, seeking compensation and filed this Appeal on the point of quantum.

¶29

4.The factum of the accident, manner of the accident, rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the 2 nd Respondent's vehicle, insured with the 3 rd Respondent are not under challenge in this Appeal. Accordingly, the finding rendered by the trial Court that the accident taken place due to the rash

¶30

and negligent driving of the driver of the 2 nd Respondent's vehicle, insured with the 3 rd Respondent are hereby confirmed.

¶31

3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶33

5.During the trial, on the side of the claim Petitioners, PW1 & PW2 were

¶34

examined & Ex.P1 to Ex.P.18 were marked and on the side of the Respondents, none was examined and no document was marked.

¶35

6.Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the claim Petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company.

¶36

7.As per Ex.P3/copy of driving license of the deceased, the deceased is aged about 24 years and accordingly multiplier '18' has to be adopted. The claim Petitioners 1 & 2 are the parents of the deceased/bachelor and claim Petitioners 3 & 4 are the sisters of the deceased, who are dependants of the deceased. As per Ex.P.17/legalheirs certificate issued by the competent authority, the deceased died as a bachelor and hence ½ deduction has to be made. The deceased has completed his college studies and running a mobile shop in the name of Anand Madhu Mobile Shop at Hosur. Considering the same, this Court fixed the notional income of the deceased at Rs.12,000/-. The Tribunal has added 40% towards future prospects, the same is hereby

¶37

4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶39

confirmed and hence, the pecuniary loss sustained by the claim Petitioners are

¶40

re-assessed as follows:

¶41

[Rs.12,000/- + (40% of 12000/-)] x 12 x 18 x ½ = Rs.18,14,400/-

¶42

8.The claim Petitioners 1 to 4 are entitled to Rs.40,000/- each towards

¶43

loss of love and affection. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.15,000/towards loss of estate, Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses, which are just and

¶44

proper and the same are hereby confirmed. Apart from this, a sum of Rs.15,000/- is awarded towards transportation charges.

¶45

S.No.	Head	Amount (Rs.)
1	Pecuniaryloss	1814400
2	Loss of Love and affection	160000
3	Transportation	15000
4	Funeral expenses	15000
5	Loss of Estate	15000
	Total Compensation	2019400

¶46

In total, the claim Petitioners are entitled to a sum of Rs.20,19,400/- (Rupees

¶47

twenty lakh nineteen thousand and four hundred only) and the interest awarded

¶48

by the Tribunal at the rate of 7.5% per annum is also confirmed.

¶49

5/8

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶52

9.In fine,

¶53

(i) this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands partly allowed, enhancing the compensation from Rs.15,10,800/- to Rs. 20,19,400/ - to the extent indicated above. No Costs.

¶54

(ii) the Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced award amount, with 7.5% interest per annum a nd costs before the Tribunal, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶55

(iii) on such deposit being made, all the claim Petitioners/Appellants are entitled to get their share in the enhanced award amount, as per the ratio of apportionment made by the Tribunal. The claim Petitioners are permitted to withdraw their entire share with proportionate interest and costs, less the award amount already withdrawn, if any, by filing necessary application before the Tribunal.

¶56

6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶58

(iv) the claim Petitioners are directed to pay the court fee, if any, for the enhanced compensation amount and the Registry is directed to draft the decree only after the receipt of Court fee.

¶59

27.03.2024

¶60

Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sai

¶61

¶62

The Special District Judge Special District Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Krishnagiri.

¶63

7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶65

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J,

¶66

sai

¶67

Pre-delivery Judgment made in C.M.A.No.2850 of 2021

¶68

Dated: 27.03.2024

¶69

8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Radha v. Balakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radha v. Balakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohamed Ali @ Ali Allah Babu Vs N. Venkatesh

The Manager Vs Gopal Samy

Sakthivel Vs the Managing Director

R Emayavaramabn Vs State Rep.by

Saranya Vs M. Karthikeyan

M.Sathishkumar Vs D.Vinothkumar