van driver, this Court is unable to find any reason to interfere with such finding of the Tribunal. Therefore, challenging the award on the ground of the contributory negligence does not arise. Insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned, the deceased was studying B.Com II year at the time of accident. Therefore, the notional income of Rs.10,000/- was fixed and the correct multiplier of “18” was adopted and 1/3 rd towards personal expenses was deducted as the deceased was unmarried at the time of accident. The compensation was arrived at awarding the justifiable compensation for pain and sufferings of Rs.60,000/- to each of the respondents 1 and 2/parents of the deceased and Rs.15,000/- for funeral expenses, Rs.10,000/- for transportation charges and Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate. Accordingly, the Tribunal arrived at the compensation of Rs.16,00,000/- and fixed the entire negligence on the appellant Insurance Company. Therefore, finding no ground to interfere with the compensation arrived by the Tribunal and the fixation of negligence on the van driver, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and the award dated 19.02.2021 made in M.C.O.P.No.113 of 2016 is hereby confirmed. There shall be no
