time of accident, the avocation of the claimant was Driver and in the accident, he sustained multiple injuries, spinal cord injuries. Resultantly, he could not able to do his work like as he was doing earlier. It is further stated that the claimant could not able to stand, sit and squat. The Tribunal has observed in its award that claimant has sustained spinal cord injuries in D4, D6, D9, D7 and D10 and undergone surgery. Further, as per Ex.C1/disability certificate, which has been issued by the Medical Board stated that the 1st respondent has sustained disability at 60%, but the Tribunal has fixed the functional disability at 100% and adopted the multiplier method. It is observed in the impugned award that by following the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Raj Kumar vs. Ajay Kumar & Anr. reported in 2012 ACJ (1), the compensation under the head permanent disability was assessed as loss of earning capacity at 100%. The Tribunal has also stated that the claimant was not in a position to stand, sit and walk and requires assistance continuously as if he is in a vegetative state. But that is not the condition of the claimant as on today. He has recovered well. This Court is of the view that 60% disability assessed by the Medical Board would be appropriate and since he is able to walk and do his regular work on his own. Today, the claimant
