This single-paragraph order dismisses the appeals and connected miscellaneous petition as withdrawn by the appellant on account of low tax effect.
Appeals and connected Miscellaneous Petition dismissed as withdrawn on account of low tax effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:MHC:4014
C.M.A.Nos. 1782 & 1787 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
C.M.A.Nos. 1782 & 1787 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos. 5774 & 5779 of 2019
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai II Commissionerate, MHU Complex, No.692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 60 0035. .... Appellant in both CMAs
vs
M/s. Chennai Pressings Private Limited Unit II, 289/1, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 098. .. 1st respondent in CMA 1782/19
M/s. Rohini Cables, Plot NO.21-G, Sidco Industrial Estate, Chennai – 600 098. .. 1st respondent in CMA 1787/19
The Customs Excise and Service, Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench, Shastri Bhavan Annex 1st Floor, 26, Haddows Road, Chennai – 600 006. .... 2nd respondent in both CMAs
Prayer in CMA No. 1782 of 2019: Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, Chennai dated 08.07.2015 made in Final Order no. 41504 of 2015.
Prayer in CMA No. 1787 of 2019: Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, Chennai dated 08.07.2015 made in Final Order no. 40985 of 2015.
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J. and
1/2
C.M.A.Nos. 1782 & 1787 of 2019
G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J. For Appellant : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel (in both appeals) For Respondents : No appearance for R1 in CMA 1782/19 Not ready in notice for R1 in CMA 1787/19 R2 – Tribunal (in both appeals)
COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant,
vide request dated 22.11.2024 has sought withdrawal of these appeals, as
the appellant does not wish to pursue the same on account of low tax effect.
connected Miscellaneous Petition are dismissed as withdrawn on account
of low tax effect. No costs.
[A.S.M. J] [G.A.M., J] sl 29.11.2024 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes Speaking order To The Customs Excise and Service, Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench, Shastri Bhavan Annex 1st Floor, 26, Haddows Road, Chennai – 600 006.
C.M.A.Nos. 1782 & 1787 of 2019
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai II Commissionerate
The Customs Excise and Service, Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench
Dr. Anita Sumanth
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
