Dismissed
Senthil v. Venugopal
Madras HCCMA/1725/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a civil appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(u) CPC as infructuous after the appellant's counsel sought and was granted permission to withdraw the appeal, deeming the matter closed without substantive adjudication by the court.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
AI extract
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the civil appeal which has become infructuous due to withdrawal should be dismissed as infructuous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Senthil
- respondent
Venugopal
- respondent
Kannan
- respondent
Tirupathi
- respondent
Raja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court