M.Shiva Shanmuganathan v. S. Ramamoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative order only: the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted the trial court a further two months to dispose of O.S.No.179 of 2009, stating that no further extension would be granted. The order decides nothing of general application.
What did the court decide?
Two months' further time granted for disposal of O.S.No.179 of 2009, with no further time to be granted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Thursday, the Twelfth day of June Two Thousand and Twenty
Five
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN AS(MD). No.31 of 2020
- M. Shiva Shanmuganathan 2. K. Kandavel Balamurugan 3. M. Lakshmi 4. M. Hemamalini 5. S. Sujatha 6. M. Aiswarya
- K. Murugesan ...Appellants/Defendants Vs. S. Ramamoorthy ...Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer :-
Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure,to set aside the judgement and decree made in OS.No.179 of 2009 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge PCR Trichy dated 16.9.2019 and allow the first appeal.
ORDER:-
This Appeal Suit coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.J.A.Punithan, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Advocate for the Appellant and of Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar for
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Shiva Shanmuganathan
- appellant
K. Kandavel Balamurugan
- appellant
M. Lakshmi
- appellant
M. Hemamalini
- appellant
S. Sujatha
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court