Dismissed

V. Pachaikannu Thevar, v. the Competent Authority and

Madras HC8 Aug 2024AS(MD)/204/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An appeal suit arose from an order refusing to pay land acquisition proceeds. The court directed the authorities to disburse the amount to the parties as per a prior civil court decree fixing shares, disposing of the appeal suit.

What did the court decide?

Directions to disburse acquisition amount to parties as per the decree in O.S.No. 195 of 2007 within a reasonable time.

V. Pachaikannu Thevar, Vs the Competent Authority and — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

A.S.(MD)No.204 of 2014

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 08.08.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶8

A.S(MD)No.204 of 2014

V.Pachaikannu Thevar

... Appellant

Vs.

1.The Competent Authority and Special

¶13

District Revenue Officer,

¶14

Land Acquisition, National Highways, Tirunelveli-11.

¶15

2.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Unit-II, National Highways Expansion Scheme, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

¶16

3.C.Subramania Thevar (died)

¶17

(The respondents 15^th to 21^st are added as L.Rs., on 02.07.2004 as per I.A.No. 124 of 2004)

4.T.Lakshmanan

5.C.Sivasubramanian

6.C.Sivasubramanian

7.C.Subramanian

8.D.Sivasangu

9.A.Alagammal 10.E.Balakrishnan 11.K.Muthammal 12.S.Saroja

¶24

13.C.Kanthasamy

¶25

1/5

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

A.S.(MD)No.204 of 2014

¶28

14.The Governor of Tamil Nadu, Through District Collector, Tirunelveli.

¶29

15.Parvathi 16.Sankarammal 17.Chidambaram 18.Kalyani 19.Raman 20.Lakshmanan 21.Sankarammal 22.Kandasamy 23.Chellathai ...Respondents (As per order in I.A.No.7 / 2011 dated 01.02.2011)

¶30

PRAYER: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., praying to set aside the order dated 21.07.2014 in O.P.No.17 of 2010 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli Division, Tirunelveli.

¶31

For Appellant : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For R1, R2 & R14 : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader

¶32

For R5, R11 to R13 R21 to R23 : Dismissed vide Order dated 04.07.2018 For R6 to R10 : No Appearance

¶33

JUDGMENT

¶34

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)

¶35

This Appeal Suit is filed against the order passed in O.P.No.17 of 2010, dated 21.07.2014 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge,

¶36

Tirunelveli Division, Tirunelveli.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

2/5

¶39

A.S.(MD)No.204 of 2014

¶40

2.The acquisition, award and quantum are not in dispute. The only

¶41

dispute between the parties is about share. Therefore, the suit in O.S.No.195 of 2007 has been filed and the same was dismissed. On appeal in A.S.No.60 of 2010, the Sub Court, Valliyoor remitted back the suit to the trial Court and subsequently, the suit was decreed.

¶42

3.In that view of the matter, since there is no dispute regarding the acquisition and the quantum and now, the civil Court also decided the rights and shares of the parties in the suit and there is no challenge against the decree and judgment passed by the civil Court, the authorities are directed to disburse the amount to the parties as per the decree passed by the civil Court in O.S.No. 195 of 2007, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Valliyoor within a reasonable time.

¶43

4.With the above direction, this Appeal Suit is disposed of. No costs.

¶44

[P.V, J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.]

¶45

08.08.2024

¶46

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No

¶47

Yuva

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶49

A.S.(MD)No.204 of 2014

¶50

¶51

1.The Competent Authority and Special District Revenue Officer,

¶52

Land Acquisition, National Highways, Tirunelveli-11.

¶53

2.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Unit-II, National Highways Expansion Scheme, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District.

¶54

3.The Governor of Tamil Nadu, Through District Collector, Tirunelveli.

¶55

4.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶57

A.S.(MD)No.204 of 2014

¶58

P.VELMURUGAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

¶59

Yuva

¶60

JUDGMENT MADE IN A.S(MD)No.204 of 2014

¶61

08.08.2024

¶62

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

V. Pachaikannu Thevar, v. the Competent Authority and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Pachaikannu Thevar, v. the Competent Authority and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karumbachalam, Vs Tamilselvi

A.Rajendran, Vs the Joint Commissioner

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs Jothi

H.Abdul Gani(Died) Vs Venmathi Aachi

K. Paulraj, S/O. Kamalan Gener Vs the Principal Secretary

The Managing Director Vs N.John Justus