First appeal filed under Section 96 CPC against a Fast Track Court decree was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the listing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.S.(MD).No.2 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
A.S(MD)No.2 of 2014 and M.P(MD) No.1 of 2014
S.R.Murugan @ Naveen S.R.Prabhu
... Appellant/Plaintiff
-vs-
(The 1st respondent represented by Power agent P.Gopi, 2nd respondent herein)
PRAYER: First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2009 in O.S.No.128 of 2004 on the file of the Fast Track Court, Dindigul.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.R.Venkatesan
1/4
A.S.(MD).No.2 of 2014
J U D G M E N T
When the matter was listed on 25.03.2024, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the matter is listed today i.e., on 27.03.2024 under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, this First Appeal stands dismissed for Non-Prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
27.03.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi
2/4
A.S.(MD).No.2 of 2014
To
3/4
A.S.(MD).No.2 of 2014
P.DHANABAL,J.
ebsi
A.S(MD)No.2 of 2014
27.03.2024
4/4
S.R.Murugan @ Naveen S.R.Prabhu
P.Rajendran
P.Gopi
P.Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
