R. Saroja, v. Tmt. R. Chitra
Case brief
What is this about?
First appeal against a decree in a property suit was dismissed for default as neither side appeared; the connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.
What the court decided
A.S(MD)No.104 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.07.2024
CORAM
JUSTICE N. SESHASAYEE and JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
A.S(MD)No.104 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
R.Saroja ... Appellant/2nd defendant Vs.
1.R.Chitra 2.Minor Hariharan
2nd respondent rep. through his mother and natural guardian ... Respondents/Plaintiffs 3.K.V.Rajupillai 4.R.Balachandran 5.Manjula ... Respondents/Defendants 1, 3, 4
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2014 in O.S.No.61 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul.
_________Page 1 of 4
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Saroja
- respondent
R. Chitra
- respondent
Minor Hariharan (rep. by his mother and natural guardian)
- respondent
K.V. Rajupillai
- respondent
R. Balachandran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court