First appeal against a decree in a suit from the District Court, Kanchipuram. Counsel for the appellant remained absent across multiple hearings, so the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AS No.269 of 2019
4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
AS No. 269 of 2019
A.Karthikeyan ... Appellant
Vs
P.Bakkiyalakshmi ... Respondent
This appeal is filed under Section 96 read with Order XVL Rule 1
of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2018 passed in O.S.No.72 of 2016 on the file of the District Court II, Kanchipuram.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.Anbalagan
1/3
AS No.269 of 2019
J U D G E M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
The learned counsel for the appellant absent continuously for more
than one hearing. Hence the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.SUBRAMANIAN, J .) (R.SAKTHIVEL, J.) 03.07.2024
jv
Index : No Internet : Yes Non Speaking order Neutral Citation: No
To
2/3
AS No.269 of 2019
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
jv
AS No. 269 of 2019
03.07.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Karthikeyan
P.Bakkiyalakshmi
R.Subramanian
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
