Disposed

Mohammed Saifulla v. M/s.Cholamandalam Investments And Finance Limited Rep By Is General Manager

Madras HC2 Sept 2024Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/118/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras, in an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointed Mr. K.S.Gowthaman as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between the petitioner and respondent regarding a 1999 agreement, following their mutual consent.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. K.S.Gowthaman as sole arbitrator with a direction to decide within six months.

Mohammed Saifulla Vs M/s.Cholamandalam Investments And Finance… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No. 118 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No. 118 of 2024

¶7

Mohammed Saifulla S/o.Mohammed Yousuf Proprietor Superior Electricals No.773, Behind Pops Foods R.T.Nagar Post, Bangalore – 560032. ...Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Limited Rep. By its General Manager Dare House, No.2, NSC Bose Road Chennai-600001. ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate and resolve the disputes through arbitral proceedings between

¶11

the parties in respect of the agreement No.BLAR16714 dated 01.04.1999

¶12

in the light of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 4

¶14

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No. 118 of 2024

¶15

Civil Appeal No. 3404 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No.3006 of 2021

¶16

dated 01.05.2023.

¶17

For Petitioner : Ms.A.Vinupradha For Respondent : Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Arbitration Original Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate and resolve the disputes through arbitral proceedings between the parties in respect of the agreement No.BLAR16714 dated 01.04.1999 in the light of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 3404 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No.3006 of 2021 dated 01.05.2023.

¶20

Heard Ms.A.Vinupradha, learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶21

Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶22

Both the learned counsels also have consented for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator by this Court and they have requested this Court to

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4

¶24

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No. 118 of 2024

¶25

appoint an Advocate as Arbitrator. In such circumstances, this Court appoints Mr.K.S.Gowthaman, Advocate, (Mobile No. 9841270992) having office at New No.6, Old No.11, 3^rd Floor, Francis Joseph Street, Parrys, Chennai-600001 as Sole Arbitrator to enter upon the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶26

The learned Sole Arbitrator is entitled to fix his fees as per the schedule-IV to the Act. This Court further requests the learned Sole Arbitrator to endeavour to decide the dispute as expeditiously as possible, however, not later than six(6) months from the date of his entering into reference.

¶27

Accordingly, this Arbitration Original Petition is ordered.

¶28

02.09.2024

¶29

Index :Yes/No Maya

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 4

¶31

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No. 118 of 2024

¶32

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶33

Maya

¶34

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No. 118 of 2024

¶35

02.09.2024

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4

Mohammed Saifulla v. M/s.Cholamandalam Investments And Finance Limited Rep By Is General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Saifulla v. M/s.Cholamandalam Investments And Finance Limited Rep By Is General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh, Proprietor, Vs The Official Liquidator

The Official Liquidator Vs Shri.Mohamad Ali

The Official Liquiator Vs nil

M/s.Electronica Finance Limited Vs Auxi Solution System

Sew Ncillp Joint Venture Vs Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (Rvnl)

P.Dilli Sekar Vs the Official Assignee