The Court allowed the plaintiff's application for reception of an additional document to be marked as an Exhibit. Matters were adjourned to 23.02.2024.
Application allowed; document received and marked as Exhibit on plaintiff's side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A. No.760 of 2024
in C.S. (Comm. Div). No.1 of 2024
A. No.760 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
This application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking for reception of additional document.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent has not raised any serious objection for allowing this application, provided the document is allowed to be received and marked as Exhibit, subject to its admission, proof and relevancy.
3. This Court is also satisfied with the reasons contained in the affidavit
filed in support of this application as sufficient cause has been shown. Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for and the document is allowed to be received and marked as Exhibit on the side of the plaintiff, subject to its admission, proof and relevancy.
4. The learned counsel for the plaintiff also seeks time to get instructions as to whether the plaintiff will be interested to go for trial instead of arguing the
interlocutory applications.
5. Post the matter on 23.02.2024.
12.02.2024
vsi2
A. No.760 of 2024
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
A. No.760 of 2024 in C.S. (Comm. Div). No.1 of 2024
12.02.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the application for reception of an additional document.
Plaintiff
Respondent
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
