Ashok Kumar Bohra v. M Film Factory
Case brief
What is this about?
A.No.6653 of 2023 in Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.)No.506…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.6653 of 2023
A.No.6653 of 2023 in Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.)No.506 of 2023
C.SARAVANAN, J.
The notice that was taken out on the respondent at the address in the
Film Assignment Agreements signed between the applicant and the respondent has remained unserved as the postal receipt has been returned with an endorsement "left without instructions".
- Under these circumstances, the applicant was permitted to move this application for effecting substituted service of notice on the respondent.
- Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is ordered.
- The applicant is permitted to take out substituted service of notice
on the respondent by effecting Paper Publications in English Newspaper "Deccan Chronicle", in Chennai Edition and in Tamil Daily Newspaper
"Daily Thanthi".
1/2
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
C. Saravanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court