S.Kumaraguru v. P.Arun
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory application in C.S.No.55 of 2024 seeking to receive the applicant's reply statement to the defendant's written statement. The court allowed the application and directed that the reply statement be taken on record.
What did the court decide?
Reply statement filed by applicant permitted to be taken on record.
What the court decided
A. 6333 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN A. 6333 of 2024 in CS.No.55 of 2024
S.KUMARAGURU
S/O K.SUBBIAH, RESIDING AT NO.8/10, JOTHINAGAR,2ND STREET, E-4, BALAJI FLATS, EKATUTHANGAL, CHENNAI 600 032.
APPLICANT(S)
Vs
P.ARUN
S/O PARAMASIVAM, RESIDING AT NO.15/35,4TH STREET, PADMANADHA NAGAR, ADYAR, CHENNAI 600 020. HAVING FACTORY AT M/S ADIT INTERNATIONAL PLASTIC PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.P.ARUN, NO.238, DEVELOPED PLOT, SIDCO, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, THIRUMUDIVAKKAM( NEAR PALLAVARAM) CHENNAI 44
RESPONDENT(S)
For Applicant(s): M/S.K.VENKATESWARAN M.PREMKUMAR S.AMBIKA V.SATHISH KUMAR V.K.KAVIN For Respondent(s): No APPEARANCE
Parties & counsel
- applicant
S.Kumaraguru
- respondent
P.Arun
Coram
G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court