G.Kumar v. B.Gowri
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory application by defendants in a civil suit seeking leave to receive and mark documents listed in a Judge's summons; allowed without objection from the plaintiffs, subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof.
What did the court decide?
Applicants permitted to receive and mark documents listed in the Judge's summons, subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof.
What the court decided
A.No.5970 of 2024 in
C.S No.296 of 2014
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
This application has been filed by the applicants/defendants 1 & 2 to receive the documents as mentioned in the Judge's summons.
- The learned counsel for the respondents 1 & 2/plaintiffs has no objection in allowing this application.
- In view of no objection made by the other side and having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, this Court is inclined to permit the applicants/ defendants 1 & 2 to mark the documents as listed in the Judge's summons, however, subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof. Accordingly, this application is allowed.
25.11.2024
uma
Note: Post on 02.12.2024
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Defendants 1 & 2 (applicants)
- respondent
Plaintiffs (respondents 1 & 2)
Coram
A.A. Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court