Disposed

P.R.Shanmugasundaram v. R.Mallika .

Madras HC20 Dec 2024A/5873/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application to condone a 378-day delay in filing a restoration petition to restore a partition suit dismissed against the fifth defendant. Respondents raised no serious objection; the court condoned the delay, directed respondents to comply with an earlier order dated 18.07.2024, and posted the matter to 09.01.2025.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 378 days in filing the restoration petition condoned; matter posted to 09.01.2025.

P.R.Shanmugasundaram Vs R.Mallika . — Partition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

A NO. 5873 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-12-2024

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

¶5

A NO. 5873 of 2024

¶6

AND A NO. 282 OF 2024, CS NO. 125 OF 1996, A NO. 281 OF 2024

¶7

P.R.Shanmugasundaram S/o.P.S.Rajasekaran, No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Ch-600 091. (the Plaintffs 2 To 4 Are Brought On Record As The Lrs Of Sole Plaintiff As Per Order Dt. 30.08.2016 In Appl.No.6167/13 And 4628, 4629/16)

Applicant(s)

R.Mallika .

W/o.Late P.S.Rajasekaran, No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091. and 11 Others

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

A Nos.281 & 282 of 2024

Applicant(s)

R.Mallika .And 10 Others S/o.P.S.Rajasekaran, No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Ch-600 091. (the Plaintffs 2 To 4 Are Brought On Record As The Lrs Of Sole Plaintiff As Per Order Dt. 30.08.2016 In Appl.No.6167/13 And 4628, 4629/16) and 10 Others

¶18

Respondent(s)

¶19

CS NO. 125 of 1996

¶20

P. Rajasekaran (deceased) S/o. Late. Sivam Mudaliar, Residing At Old No.139/1, New No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Ch-600 091.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

and 3 Others

Applicant(s)

S.Saraswathi(died)

S/o. Late. Sivam Mudaliar, Residing At Old No.139/1, New No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Ch-600 091. and 11 Others

¶27

Respondent(s)

¶28

A NO. 5873 of 2024

¶29

For Applicant(s): Ms.D.Esther Priya For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Nellaiappan

¶30

ORDER

¶31

This Application in A.No.5873 of 2024 is filed to condone the delay of 378 days in filing the restoration petition to restore the suit on file which has been dismissed as against 5^th defendant.

¶32

Mr.D.Nellaiappn, learned counsel for the respondents has no serious objection for this Application being allowed as prayed for.

¶33

Considering the suit is one for partition, this Application for delay is condoned and accordingly ordered .

¶34

The learned counsel for the respondents is directed to comply with the order of this Court dated 18.07.2024.

¶35

Post the matter on 09.01.2025.

¶36

20-12-2024

¶37

rkp

¶38

Note: Registry is directed to number the restoration petition, if it is otherwise in order.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.R.Shanmugasundaram v. R.Mallika .

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.R.Shanmugasundaram v. R.Mallika .

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Compass India Food Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s.Psr Foods

Suzlon Global Services Limited Vs Industrial Mineral Co. and another

M/S Arka Fincap Limited Vs Mr.subramanian saravanan

V.Muruganantham Vs 1. Balasubramania Chettiar (Died) 2. Jeyalakshmi

M.Gandhiselvin Vs Tmt. Lakshmipriya, I.A.S.

M/s.Pioneer Polyleathers Pvt. Lt Vs M/s.Comper Products Co.