Allowed

Rm.Ar.Lakshmanan v. Rm.Ar.Senthilnathan

Madras HC10 Dec 2024A/5539/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Third defendant in a partition suit sought appointment as party receiver to let out vacant suit properties, collect rents, and manage them. The Madras High Court allowed the application, appointing the applicant as party receiver with six-monthly reporting, and listed the suit for evidence.

What did the court decide?

Applicant appointed as party receiver to manage suit properties and collect rents; reports once in six months.

Rm.Ar.Lakshmanan Vs Rm.Ar.Senthilnathan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

A. 5539 of 2024 in CS.No.335 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-12-2024 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶3

A. No.5539 of 2024 in CS.No.335 of 2011

¶4

RM.AR.LAKSHMANAN S/O.RM.AR.AR.RM.AR.ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR, DOOR NO.91/2, VINAYAGA NAGAR, KATCHERI ROAD, MYLAPORE,CH-4

¶5

APPELLANT(S)

¶6

¶7

RM.AR.SENTHILNATHAN PLOT NO.104, SWAMI VIVEKANANDHA NAGAR, SAMBAKULAM,MADURAI - 7. AND 5 OTHERS

¶8

RESPONDENT(S)

¶9

For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s):

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This application has been filed to appoint the applicant herein as a party receiver to let

¶12

out the vacant properties on rent and to collect the rents receivable from the said properties and to manage the suit schedule properties.

¶13

The Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the suit schedule properties are

¶14

not maintained properly. Therefore the applicant/3rd defendant prays to appoint himself

¶15

as the party receiver for the proper maintenance. Hence he seeks to allow this application.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the 1st respondent/plaintiff

¶18

who is settled at Madurai may be appointed as a party receiver for the maintenance of

¶19

the suit schedule properties.

¶20

Heard both sides.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case and being satisfied with the

¶22

reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, the applicant is

¶23

appointed as a party receiver and administer the suit property and file his report once in

¶24

six months.

¶25

Accordingly, this application is allowed.

¶26

Registry is directed to list the suit before the learned Additional Master for recording

¶27

evidence on 03.01.2025.

¶28

gv 10-12-2024

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J gv

¶31

¶32

RM.AR.SENTHILNATHAN PLOT NO.104, SWAMI VIVEKANANDHA NAGAR, SAMBAKULAM,MADURAI - 7.

¶33

RM.AR ARUNACHALAM (DIED)

¶34

RM.AR.AR.RM.AR.ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR,DOOR NO.6 AND 7,SATHIRATHARAR STREET, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶35

RM.AR.RAMANATHAN

¶36

S/O.RM.AR.AR.RM.AR.ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR, DOOR NO.6 AND 7,SATHIRATHARAR STREET, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶37

PRETHA RATHNAM MUTHANNA

¶38

W/O.ASHOK MUTHANNA, NO.5, NEW BEACH ROAD, THIRUVANMIYUR, CHENNAI-41.

¶39

KGEYESS RESIDENCY (P) LTD.,

¶40

REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR P.V.SHANMUGAM,SRUSHTISSHAL, NEW NO.10, 2ND CROSS STREET, RAJA ANNAMALAIPURAM, CHENNAI-28.

¶41

MRS.UMAYAL AACHI

¶42

W/O. RM.AR.ARUNACHALAM, A/5, 2ND FLOOR, GUHALAYA, NO.179, ROYAPETTAH HIGH ROAD, MYLAPORE, CH-4

¶43

A. 5539 of 2024 in CS.No.335 of 2011

¶44

10.12.2024

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rm.Ar.Lakshmanan v. Rm.Ar.Senthilnathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rm.Ar.Lakshmanan v. Rm.Ar.Senthilnathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Surans Traders Vs Ecgc Limited

M/s.Dharani Finance Ltd. Vs S.Subramani

S.Mukanchand Bothra Vs v.T.v.Sharma

K.Jeya Meshack Vs Daniel Thomas (Deceased) M.Lidya Arputhamani (Deceased) 1.D.Jencee Leena and 2 others

N.S.Ziauddeen Vs M/S.Naftogaz India Pvt. Ltd.

Mrs.Subhana Begum Vs Dr.C.Arumugham