Applications by defendants 1, 2 and 4 to condone delay in filing written statements were allowed without objection from the plaintiff; written statements accepted on file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.3780, 3779 & 3781 of 2024 in CS.No.91 of 2023
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
These applications are filed by the
defendants 1, 2 and 4 to condone the delay in filing the written statements.
applicants and learned counsel for the respondents.
respondent/plaintiff has stated no objection in allowing these applications and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
file its written statement in accordance with
law.
06.08.2024
tsh
Defendants 1, 2 and 4
First respondent/plaintiff
Teekaa Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
