K.Vimala v. D.Umamaheshwaran and another
Case brief
What is this about?
in C.S.DR.No.59720 of 2024 RMT. TEEKAA…
What the court decided
A.No.3388 of 2024 in
C.S.DR.No.59720 of 2024
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
The 2nd respondent had been served and her name is also printed in the cause list, but there is no appearance for the 2nd respondent.
2.There are two schedule mentioned properties namely, schedule - A and schedule - B. It is seen from the records that 'A' schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and 'B' schedule property is situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court. Since the dispute with regard to both A and B schedule properties are common, this application has been filed seeking leave to institute the suit.
3.In view of the above facts, leave is granted. This application is allowed accordingly.
4.The Registry may proceed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order.
08.08.2024
smv
Parties & counsel
- other
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
- respondent
2nd Respondent
Coram
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court