Dismissed
M/s.B Company v. v.Nithya and 3 others
Madras HCA/3265/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The application to condone a delay of 89 days in filing the application to set aside a previous order was dismissed due to lack of satisfactory explanation from the applicant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.No.3265 of 2024 in E.P.No.98 of 2022
¶2
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
¶3
This application to condone the delay of 89 days in filing the application to set aside the order dated 20.03.2024 in A.No.6512 of 2023 in E.P.No.98 of 2022 by the Master is dismissed for want of satisfactory explanation.
¶4
06.12.2024
¶5
ari
¶6
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether sufficient cause is shown to condone 89 days of delay in filing the application?
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Master
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court