The Chief Manager, Southern Railway v. a.Ranganayaki
Case brief
What is this about?
This order is procedural in nature, condoning a 121-day delay in filing a written statement and listing a counter affidavit. It does not decide any substantive legal issue or proposition of law.
What the court decided
A.No.3176 of 2024 in C.S.No.246 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
This Application has been filed to condone the delay of 121 days in filing the written statement in C.S.No.246 of 2023.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondents.
3.Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Application and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicant, I am inclined to order this Application.
4.The written statement filed by the Applicant is taken on file.
5.Accordingly, this Application is ordered.
sai
A.No.3177 of 2024 in C.S.No.246 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court