Application to file additional documents (2007-2022) in a 2013 suit after pleadings and issues were completed was dismissed; applicants gave no reason for the belated production and pre-Commercial Court rules required documents with the plaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2945 of 2024 in C.S.No.653 of 2013
P.VELMURUGAN, J.,
This application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs seeking permission to file additional documents in the suit in C.S.No.653 of 2013.
1/3
not stated any reason for filing the additional documents belatedly at this stage.
This Court is not satisfied with reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit
filed in support of the application. Hence the application is dismissed.
24.06.2024
( 2/ 2 )
mfa
2/3
P.VELMURUGAN, J.,
mfa
A.No.2945 of 2024 in C.S.No.653 of 2013
24.06.2024
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Should permission be granted to the plaintiffs to file additional documents dated 2007-2022 after completion of pleadings and framing of issues, without stated reasons for the delay?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicants/Plaintiffs in C.S.No.653 of 2013
P.Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
