Union of India, Rep.by Chief Engineer(Af) v. Vcc Enterprises, Proprietor M.Ramanna (Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
and O.P.No.957 of 2019 C.SARAVANAN, J.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2745 of 2022 and O.P.No.957 of 2019
C.SARAVANAN, J.
Notice on the 4th respondent who is the other daughter of the deceased proprietor and sole respondent in O.P.No.957 of 2019 is not necessary and therefore dispensed with as the 2nd respondent appears as the legal representative of the deceased proprietor of the sole respondent in O.P.No.957 of 2017.
- The learned counsel for the second respondent submits that the second respondent will represent the estate of the deceased proprietor of the sole respondent in O.P.No.957 of 2017. He submits that the second respondent has taken over the business of the deceased respondent in O.P.No.957 of 2019 and is carrying on the business as his legal representative.
- The submission of the learned counsel for the second respondent in the above application stands recorded.
- Consequentially, no further orders are required for impleading the other legal heirs of the sole respondent in O.P.
C.SARAVANAN,J.
tsh/kkd
Coram
C.SARAVANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court