of 2024 in C.S.No.211 of 2023…
The application to take two documentary exhibits (a Power of Attorney and its subsequent cancellation) on record was allowed subject to proof, relevancy, and admissibility.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.2133 of 2024 in C.S.No.211 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
This application has been filed seeking to take on record two further documents which are General Power of Attorney executed by D1 in favour of D2 on 27.10.2010 and cancellation of that particular Power of Attorney by D2 on 04.01.2022.
plaintiff. It is also stated that D2 had paid the amount to D1 and a Power of Attorney was executed and subsequently, canceled.
however, let that be tested during the course of cross examination. Subject to proof and relevancy and admissibility, the two documents are permitted to be taken on record.
26.04.2024
vkr
(1/2)
1/2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
Vkr
A.No.2133 of 2024 in C.S.No.211 of 2023
26.04.2024 (½)
2/2
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
