The Single Judge allowed an application seeking condonation of delay of 52 days for filing a written statement, noting that the statement was prepared and delaying party had no specific relief against the applicant.
Condonation of delay of 52 days for filing the written statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.No.1904 of 2024
A.No.1904 of 2024 in C.S.No.199 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.
This application has been filed to condone the delay of 52 days for filing the written statement in C.S.No.199 of 2023.
2.In the affidavit filed in support of the judges summons, it had
been stated that there was inadvertent delay in filing the written statement, though it had been prepared.
3.It has been further stated that no specific relief had been sought as against this applicant.
4.Taking all those factors into consideration, this application
stands allowed.
05.04.2024
rjr
1/2
A.No.1904 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
rjr
A.No.1904 of 2024 in CS.No.199 of 2023
05.04.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for condonation of late filing of written statement should be allowed on grounds of inadvertence and lack of specific intent to defeat
Unknown Applicant
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
