Dismissed

Arumai v. State of Tamilnadu rep. by

Madras HC25 Apr 2023WP(MD)/9893/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses a writ petition seeking to quash a land encroachment notice under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act. The court held that since the petitioner was required to provide an explanation for the notice, the writ petition is dismissed to allow her to comply, connecting all other petitions.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed; connection order for consequent petitions.

Arumai Vs State of Tamilnadu rep. by — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 25.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8724 & 8726 of 2023

Arumai

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.State of Tamil Nadu rep.by District Collector Tiruchirappalli District Tiruchirapalli

¶12

2.The District Revenue Officer Tiruchirapalli District Tiruchirapalli

¶13

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Srirangam Tiruchirapalli District

¶14

4.The Tahsildar Srirangam Taluk Tiruchirapalli District ... Respondents

¶15

____________ Page 1 of 5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023

¶18

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the fourth respondent in Na.Ka.A3/5171/2022, dated 09.11.2022 issued under Section 7 of Tamil Nadu Encroachment Act, 1905, quashing the same and consequently directing the respondents to protect the paddy crops raised in the land in Survey No.216/1 in Mekkudi Village, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirapalli District and not to destroy the Well dug in the same Survey number by the petitioner under Jeevandhara Scheme floated by the Government of Tamil Nadu.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Mani

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶23

Arumai, daughter of Sangan, has filed this writ petition, challenging the notice dated 09.11.2022, issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 by the fourth respondent, calling upon her to remove the encroachment made in Survey No.216/1 of Mekkudi Village,

¶24

Page 2 of 5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023

¶27

Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, to an extent of Hectare 01.75.500 Ares, which is classified as “kahdk;”.

¶28

2. Since the petitioner is expected to give a detailed explanation, she cannot come to this Court to offer her explanation. Therefore, directing the petitioner to give her explanation to the impugned notice, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶29

[T.R., A.C.J.] [R.S.M., J.] 25.04.2023

¶30

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶31

krk

¶32

To: 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirapalli.

¶33

2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruchirapalli District, Tiruchirapalli.

¶34

Page 3 of 5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023

¶37

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srirangam, Tiruchirapalli District.

¶38

4.The Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirapalli District.

¶39

Page 4 of 5

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023

¶42

T.RAJA, A.C.J. and R.SUBRAMANIAN , J.

¶43

krk

¶44

W.P.(MD) No.9893 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8724 & 8726 of 2023

¶45

25.04.2023

¶46

____________ Page 5 of 5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arumai v. State of Tamilnadu rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arumai v. State of Tamilnadu rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gnanaselva Pappa Vs the Commissioner

Balamurugan Vs S.Aneesh Sekhar

The State of Tamil Nadu, Vs S. Sujatha