Allowed

M/s. Sree Jegan Timbers v. M/s. Lakshmi Vilas Bank

Madras HC26 Apr 2023WP(MD)/9706/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court entertained a writ petition to quash an order disposing of a secured debt. The Court allowed the petitioner to pay in installments to redeem a residential house installed asset without immediate possession.

What did the court decide?

Bank shall not take possession if petitioner pays Rs. 17.44 lakhs by 26.05.2023; balance Rs. 55 lakhs in monthly installments starting June 2023.

M/s. Sree Jegan Timbers Vs M/s. Lakshmi Vilas Bank — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 26.04.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023 and

¶7

W.M.P.(MD) No.8573 of 2023

¶8

M/s.Sree Jegan Timbers rep.by its Proprietor R.Sankar S/o.T.Ramasamy 71/1, Santhai Road Mettupatty Dindigul District

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

-vs-

¶11

M/s.Lakshmi Vilas Bank (Through its Authorised Officer S.Rajakumar) Regional Office, 2^nd Floor, South Wing Registered Office Salem Main Road Kathaparai, Karur-639 006

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

____________ Page 1 of 5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

PRAYER:

¶16

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023

¶17

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the impugned order made in Cr.M.P.No.5198 of 2020, dated 24.03.2023, passeed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondent : Mr.S.I.Muthaiah

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE]

¶21

In view of the fact that the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, is not manned, we are entertaining this writ petition.

¶22

2. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 24.03.2023, passed in Cr.M.P.No.5198 of 2020, by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

¶23

Page 2 of 5

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023

¶26

3. The amount due is Rs.72,44,048/- (Rupees seventy two lakhs forty four thousand and forty eight only).

¶27

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be in a position to liquidate the debt, if sometime is given to him.

¶28

5. Considering the fact that the secured asset is a residential house, we feel that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to discharge the debt and redeem the secured asset. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶29

(i) The respondent – Bank shall not take possession

¶30

of the secured asset, if the petitioner pays a sum

¶31

of Rs.17,44,048/- (Rupees seventeen lakhs forty

¶32

four thousand and forty eight only) to the respondent – Bank, on or before 26.05.2023.

¶33

(ii) The balance amount amount of Rs.55,00,000/(Rupees fifty five lakhs only) shall be paid by the

¶34

petitioner in five equated monthly installments

¶35

Page 3 of 5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023

¶38

commencing from June, 2023. The monthly instalments shall be paid on or before 26^th of every succeeding month.

¶39

(iii) The interest payable for the interregnum period and other expenses shall be paid by the petitioner along with the last installment.

¶40

(iv) If there is any default in payment as directed above, the respondent – Bank can proceed further to take possession of the secured asset as well as for recovery of the amount due.

¶41

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶42

[T.R., A.C.J.] [R.S.M., J.]

¶43

26.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶44

krk

¶45

To: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul.

¶46

____________ Page 4 of 5

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023

¶49

T.RAJA, A.C.J. and R.SUBRAMANIAN , J.

¶50

krk

¶51

W.P.(MD) No.9706 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8573 of 2023

¶52

26.04.2023

¶53

____________ Page 5 of 5

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s. Sree Jegan Timbers v. M/s. Lakshmi Vilas Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Sree Jegan Timbers v. M/s. Lakshmi Vilas Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gnanaselva Pappa Vs the Commissioner

Balamurugan Vs S.Aneesh Sekhar

The State of Tamil Nadu, Vs S. Sujatha

The Principal Secretary Vs Victoria Joseph

The Project Director Vs B.Thavamani

The District Educational Officer, Vs S. Albert